Compare
Automox keeps your machines patched and automated. WinSentinel tells you whether they're securely configured — and fixes them when they're not. Patching closes CVEs; hardening closes the gaps no patch touches.
TL;DR: Automox is cloud-native patch & configuration automation (find missing updates, deploy them across Windows/macOS/Linux, and run custom scripts called Worklets to enforce settings). WinSentinel is a security hardening tool (audit misconfigurations, score posture, auto-fix, map to compliance) with the Windows hardening knowledge built in. They solve different problems — Automox is a generic automation engine you script, WinSentinel ships the baseline. A fully patched, automated machine can still be badly misconfigured, so many teams run both.
| Capability | WinSentinel | Automox |
|---|---|---|
| Primary Purpose | Security hardening & compliance | Patch & configuration automation |
| Security Posture Score | ✓ 0-100 with grade (A-F) | ✗ Patch compliance, not a config score |
| Built-in Hardening Checks | ✓ 33 audit modules out of the box | Via Worklets you write/maintain |
| Auto-Remediation | ✓ One-click fix for findings | Deploys patches & Worklet scripts |
| Compliance Mapping | ✓ CIS, SOC2, HIPAA, Essential 8 | Patch-compliance reporting only |
| Patch Deployment | ✗ Flags missing updates only | ✓ Core strength (OS & 3rd-party) |
| Cross-Platform | Windows-specialised (10/11/Server) | ✓ Windows, macOS & Linux |
| Misconfiguration Detection | ✓ SMBv1, BitLocker, UAC, firewall… | Only what your Worklets check |
| Real-Time Monitoring | ✓ Continuous agent mode | Cloud agent, scheduled policies |
| Custom Scripting Engine | Targeted fixes, not a script platform | ✓ Worklets (PowerShell/Bash) |
| Open Source | ✓ MIT licensed | ✗ Proprietary (cloud SaaS) |
| Local-Only / No Account | ✓ Runs fully offline, no signup | ✗ Cloud account required |
| CI/CD Integration | ✓ GitHub Action + SARIF | ✗ Not designed for CI |
$0/forever
All security features, no limits, one machine. Full power, no account.
Pro fleet: $29/25 nodes · $79/100 nodes
Per endpoint/month
Free tier for a small number of endpoints; priced per endpoint per month above that. Cloud account required.
Scales per managed endpoint
Automox pricing is approximate and per their published plans; check automox.com for current rates.
Many teams run Automox to keep machines patched and automated and WinSentinel to keep them securely configured. They’re complementary — deploying the latest update doesn’t turn on BitLocker, disable SMBv1, or fix a weakened UAC policy unless someone wrote and maintains a Worklet for it.
WinSentinel finds the misconfigurations a patch & automation platform never checks by default — and fixes them in one click.
dotnet tool install --global WinSentinel.Cli
They overlap less than they appear. Automox is cloud-native patch and configuration automation — it finds missing OS and third-party updates, deploys them across your endpoints, and runs custom scripts (Worklets) to enforce settings. WinSentinel audits how a Windows machine is configured for security, scores it 0–100, maps findings to compliance frameworks, and fixes the misconfigurations it finds out of the box. Automox is a generic automation platform you script; WinSentinel ships with the Windows hardening knowledge built in. The two are complementary — a fully patched, automated machine can still be badly misconfigured.
Automox can change configuration, but only through Worklets — scripts you (or the community) write and maintain to evaluate and remediate a setting. That is a powerful general-purpose automation engine, not a curated Windows security baseline. WinSentinel ships 33 audit modules that already know what to check (SMBv1, BitLocker, TPM, UAC, firewall profiles, PowerShell logging, stale local admins, and more), score it, and one-click fix it, mapped to CIS / SOC 2 / HIPAA. With Automox you build the hardening logic; with WinSentinel it is the product.
Patching is necessary but not sufficient. A machine can be fully patched and fully automated and still expose SMBv1, run with BitLocker off, have UAC weakened, leave the public firewall profile disabled, or carry stale local-admin accounts — none of which a patch fixes and none of which Automox flags unless you wrote a Worklet for it. These configuration weaknesses are exactly what WinSentinel audits, scores, and remediates by default. Automox closes the CVE and update gap; WinSentinel closes the configuration gap.
Yes. WinSentinel produces a single 0–100 posture score with a letter grade and maps every finding to CIS Windows L1, SOC 2, HIPAA and Essential 8 controls. Automox reports patch compliance and device status, and you can build reports from Worklet output, but it is not a configuration-hardening or posture-scoring product, so it does not give a built-in security score for how a machine is set up.
WinSentinel is free for unlimited use on a single machine — all audit modules, the real-time monitor, scheduled scans and PDF reports, with no account. Automox is free for up to a small number of endpoints and then priced per endpoint per month above that. The pricing isn't really comparable because the tools do different jobs: WinSentinel Pro — which adds fleet management across many machines — is $29/mo for up to 25 nodes or $79/mo for up to 100 nodes, with annual billing saving 17%. Many teams run Automox for patch automation and WinSentinel for hardening together.
Yes. WinSentinel is built specifically for Windows 10 and Windows 11 (and Windows Server). It uses native Windows APIs to audit configuration that cross-platform tools treat generically, which is why its hardening checks are deeper on Windows. Automox is cross-platform by design — Windows, macOS and Linux — which is a strength for mixed-fleet patching but means its checks are not Windows-specialised.